Invasive haemodynamics at rest and exercise in cardiac amyloidosis.

AIMS: Our aim was to investigate haemodynamics at rest and during exercise in patients with transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) in light of the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines on pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed right heart catheterization (RHC) in 57 subjects with ATTR-CM. The proportion of patients with PH was 77% according to the 2022 guidelines versus 47% when applying the 2015 guidelines. Isolated post-capillary PH and combined pre- and post-capillary PH were most prevalent. Thirty-six patients underwent a supine bicycle cardiopulmonary exercise test during RHC. Exercise-induced PH was defined as an increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure from rest to exercise per increase in cardiac output (ΔmPAP/ΔCO) of > 3 mmHg/L/min. An increase in pulmonary arterial wedge pressure per change in cardiac output (ΔPAWP/ΔCO) from rest to exercise >2 mmHg/L/min was considered suggestive of post-capillary exercise-induced PH. All but two patients who exercised during RHC developed exercise-induced PH. The median ΔmPAP/ΔCO was 7.2 mmHg/L/min and ΔPAWP/ΔCO was 5.1 mmHg/L/min. The median ΔRAP/ΔCO was 3.6 mmHg/L/min and ΔRAP/ΔPAWP was 0.6 mmHg/L/min. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with ATTR-CM have isolated post-capillary or combined pre- and post-capillary PH at rest, and almost all patients develop exercise-induced PH with a large post-capillary component. There was a pronounced, but balanced increase in atrial pressures on exercise.

Pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Comparison of changes in hemodynamics and functional capacity.

The treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging option for inoperable patients. Comparisons of the hemodynamic and functional outcome between these treatments are scarce. In this single-center observational cohort study, we compared hemodynamics by right heart catheterization and peak oxygen consumption before and 5 months (±14 days) after either PEA or BPA. Comprehensive evaluation and selection for PEA or BPA was performed by an expert CTEPH team. Fourty-two and fourty consecutive patients were treated with PEA or BPA, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups. Both PEA and BPA significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (from 46 ± 11 mmHg at baseline to 28 ± 13 mmHg at follow-up; p < 0.001 and from 43 ± 12 mmHg to 31 ± 9 mmHg; p < 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (from 686 ± 347 dyn s cm-5 at baseline to 281 ± 197 dyn s cm-5 at follow-up; p < 0.001 and from 544 ± 322 dyn s cm-5 to 338 ± 180 dyn s cm-5; p < 0.001), with significantly lower reductions for both parameters in the former group. However, cardiopulmonary exercise testing revealed no significant between group differences in exercise capacity. Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide at baseline was the only follow-up predictor for peak VO2. In our study, PEA reduced pulmonary pressures more than BPA did, but similar improvements were observed for exercise capacity. Thus, while long term data after BPA is lacking, BPA treated CTEPH patients can expect physical gains in line with PEA.

Medical leadership development during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: A leadership development programme (The Health Leadership School) was launched in 2018 for junior doctors and medical students in Norway. OBJECTIVE: To study participants' experiences and self-assessed learning outcomes, and if there were any differences in outcome among participants who met face-to-face versus and those who had to complete half of the programme in a virtual classroom due to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Participants who completed The Health Leadership School in 2018-2020 were invited to respond to a web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 33 (83%) out of 40 participants responded. The majority of respondents (97%) somewhat agreed or strongly agreed that they had gained knowledge and skills they did not learn in medical school. Respondents reported a high learning outcome for most competency domains, and there was no difference in outcome when comparing scores of those who met face-to-face versus and those who had to complete half of the programme in a virtual classroom. Among participants who participated in virtual classroom sessions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority agreed that the programme could be run as a combination of face-to-face and virtual sessions. CONCLUSION: This brief report suggests that leadership development programmes for junior doctors and medical students can be run in-part using virtual classroom sessions, but that face-to-face sessions are important to foster relational and teamwork skills.